Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Access to investigational drugs

Executive Summary

FDA aims to publish by October two final rules on related investigational drug issues, the HHS regulatory agenda discloses. One would clarify when it is appropriate to charge for a drug provided in a clinical trial (1"The Pink Sheet," Dec. 18, 2006, p. 18). The other would describe ways that patients may obtain investigational drugs for treatment use as part of expanded access programs (2"The Pink Sheet," Dec. 18, 2006, p. 12). While patient groups complain that FDA proposes to define expanded access too narrowly, insurers object to the possibility that much of the cost of drugs, which might newly have a price-tag, would be passed on to them (3"The Pink Sheet," March 26, 2007, p. 21). Discussion at a recent ODAC meeting revealed that FDA wants pharma to offer more expanded access programs, but firms worry they may be penalized if rare side effects occur from a drug provided by that avenue (4"The Pink Sheet," March 17, 2008, In Brief)

FDA aims to publish by October two final rules on related investigational drug issues, the HHS regulatory agenda discloses. One would clarify when it is appropriate to charge for a drug provided in a clinical trial (1 (Also see "Clinical Trials Can Charge For Using Competitor Drugs Under FDA Proposed Rule" - Pink Sheet, 18 Dec, 2006.), p. 18). The other would describe ways that patients may obtain investigational drugs for treatment use as part of expanded access programs (2 (Also see "FDA Expanded Access Proposals Too Narrow For Patient Advocates" - Pink Sheet, 18 Dec, 2006.), p. 12). While patient groups complain that FDA proposes to define expanded access too narrowly, insurers object to the possibility that much of the cost of drugs, which might newly have a price-tag, would be passed on to them (3 , p. 21). Discussion at a recent ODAC meeting revealed that FDA wants pharma to offer more expanded access programs, but firms worry they may be penalized if rare side effects occur from a drug provided by that avenue (4 'The Pink Sheet,' March 17, 2008, In Brief).

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS049603

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel