Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

NSF GMP program

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

NSF International announces May 30 its good manufacturing practices readiness program, "One Step Ahead," which includes an online service center to help manufacturers prepare for the GMPs. NSF will audit facilities and note any non-conformances, giving firms opportunities to take corrective action before FDA audits. NSF's program offers a source book containing standard operating procedure templates and a trial self-audit tool. FDA and the Office of Management and Budget announced GMPs received final clearance from OMB on May 9 (1"The Tan Sheet" May 14, 2007, p. 5)...

You may also be interested in...



Dietary Supplement GMPs Back To FDA; Publication Expected In June

Dietary supplement good manufacturing practices have received final clearance by the Office of Management and Budget, OMB and FDA confirmed May 9

California Bill To Age-Restrict Sales Of Diet Pills Further Along Than Other States’ Legislation

CA, MA and NJ legislatures remain in session with bills active proposing regulations similar to NY law effective 22 April requiring retailers, including online, to ask for proof of age when customers buying consumer health products containing ingredients labeled or promoted for weight loss and bodybuilding benefits appear younger than 18.

CRN Has Standing For Steep Hill To Climb Challenging New York's Age-Restricted Sales

Federal judge finds “misreading of the legislation” in CRN’s argument that state “restricts access based purely on what has been said about the product or its ingredients.” But standing to challenge “means that only CRN is positioned right now to go before the court on behalf of industry,” says CEO Steve Mister.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS100578

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel