Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA’s MANUFACTURING CHANGE REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING GUIDANCE

This article was originally published in The Gold Sheet

Executive Summary

...are under review in the effort to alleviate the supplement burden on already marketed products. As FDA retools its quality regulatory paradigm, industry is affirming that focusing on creating a more risk-based and quality systems-oriented regulatory approach for manufacturing changes made to existing products could help spur firms down the quality-by-design pathway. Ideas that have been put on the table in response to an FDA request for industry input include: *a simplified, two-tier system requiring only supplements for high risk changes * reevaluating the format and content of annual reports and their relationship to annual product reviews * the importance of global harmonization, and * separate consideration of the API context. [Recommendations by PhRMA at an FDA meeting soliciting input on changing the 21 CFR 314.70 regulations are included. A summary of breakout discussions on the post-approval regulatory process at a recent FDA/AAPS/ISPE conference on the quality initiative is included.]

You may also be interested in...



Gottlieb: Valsartan API Crisis Spurs Drug GMP Revision

FDA commissioner discloses effort underway to tighten oversight of changes to active pharmaceutical ingredient manufacturing processes by rewriting parts of its drug GMP regulation.

McKinsey Survey Highlights Progress, Challenges in Adoption of QbD

Drug manufacturers are adopting QbD but there are exceptions, especially among some generics firms, McKinsey finds in industry survey. The top challenge to further adoption: misalignment between R&D and commercial operations. Second is a lack of belief in the business case. However, the cost turns out to be low and the financial reward high, McKinsey says.

Manufacturers Encouraged to Enhance Clinical Relevance of Quality With QbD

Using QbD to set specs that make a difference to patients is hard but important work, FDA's Woodcock says. Prasugrel, levothyroxine, pallodone examples explored. How to establish a 'work space.' How to make the right correlations.

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS000095

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel