Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Clarinex OTC Option “Valuable” In Face Of Competition – Schering-Plough

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

The option to file an OTC switch application for Rx Clarinex (desloratadine) is an important part of Schering-Plough's strategy for growth, CEO Fred Hassan said during the firm's fiscal 2006 fourth-quarter earnings call Jan. 29

You may also be interested in...



S-P settles Clarinex suit

Schering-Plough agrees to pay $165 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that news reports indicate is related to the firm's alleged failure to disclose information about the FDA review of the prescription allergy product. In a Feb. 27 posting on its Web site, Schering says the settlement was preliminarily approved by a federal court in Newark, N.J., and a final approval hearing is slated for June 1. The firm's online statement does not identify the subject of the settlement, but states the amount. Investors involved in the litigation said the company failed to disclose manufacturing problems that blocked the approval of Clarinex and led to a 2002 FDA consent decree against Schering (1"The Tan Sheet" Jan. 10, 2005, p. 5). Clarinex (desloratadine) has been mentioned as a potential OTC switch candidate (2"The Tan Sheet" Feb. 5, 2007, p. 4)

S-P settles Clarinex suit

Schering-Plough agrees to pay $165 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that news reports indicate is related to the firm's alleged failure to disclose information about the FDA review of the prescription allergy product. In a Feb. 27 posting on its Web site, Schering says the settlement was preliminarily approved by a federal court in Newark, N.J., and a final approval hearing is slated for June 1. The firm's online statement does not identify the subject of the settlement, but states the amount. Investors involved in the litigation said the company failed to disclose manufacturing problems that blocked the approval of Clarinex and led to a 2002 FDA consent decree against Schering (1"The Tan Sheet" Jan. 10, 2005, p. 5). Clarinex (desloratadine) has been mentioned as a potential OTC switch candidate (2"The Tan Sheet" Feb. 5, 2007, p. 4)

S-P settles Clarinex suit

Schering-Plough agrees to pay $165 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that news reports indicate is related to the firm's alleged failure to disclose information about the FDA review of the prescription allergy product. In a Feb. 27 posting on its Web site, Schering says the settlement was preliminarily approved by a federal court in Newark, N.J., and a final approval hearing is slated for June 1. The firm's online statement does not identify the subject of the settlement, but states the amount. Investors involved in the litigation said the company failed to disclose manufacturing problems that blocked the approval of Clarinex and led to a 2002 FDA consent decree against Schering (1"The Tan Sheet" Jan. 10, 2005, p. 5). Clarinex (desloratadine) has been mentioned as a potential OTC switch candidate (2"The Tan Sheet" Feb. 5, 2007, p. 4)

Related Content

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS100177

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel