Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Wholesaler Distribution Fee Rates May Be Lower Than Planned, Study Says

Executive Summary

Drug wholesaler distribution fees may provide lower revenues than expected, a study by Accenture and Goldman Sachs says

Drug wholesaler distribution fees may provide lower revenues than expected, a study by Accenture and Goldman Sachs says.

The "shift toward non-contingent distribution agreements will likely occur in 2005 but at lower rates than wholesalers are targeting," the study says.

The three major wholesalers - AmerisourceBergen, Cardinal and McKesson - want manufacturers to pay directly for distribution services since they can no longer rely on product price increases to provide revenue. Cardinal expects fees to bring distribution operating margins back up to about 2.5% (1 (Also see "Cardinal Fee-For-Service Ultimatum Is Serious, CEO Says" - Pink Sheet, 1 Nov, 2004.), p. 3).

"Based on our survey, there appears to be a critical mass of major drug companies that are planning to move to fee-for-service agreements with drug wholesalers sometime in 2005 or 2006." The study notes that over 50% of pharmaceutical and biotech companies interviewed expected to enter into fee-for-service contracts in the next six to 18 months.

"However, wide gaps in terms of the fee structures remain," the report adds. Manufacturers are "uncomfortable" with cost increases that would occur as a result of the new contracts, the study says; manufacturers also said they could accept a reduced service offering to maintain a fee level consistent with what they pay under current inventory management agreements.

Many manufacturers fail to see additional value in what wholesalers are offering as "value-added" services, the report says. "Few found these offerings to be particularly innovative when compared to wholesalers' existing offerings."

Services that manufacturers cited as "potentially additive" were special product handling, promotional marketing, recalls management and launch support.

Cardinal and McKesson have set April 1 as a deadline for converting to fee-for-service agreements.

However, the study notes that the effective deadline is the renewal date of the inventory management agreements. Because 75% of wholesalers' volume is governed by inventory management deals, which expire throughout 2005, "the immediacy of the April 1 deadline may not be significant."

The report was written by Accenture Partner-Health & Life Sciences James Hintlian and Goldman Sachs Managing Director Christopher McFadden based on surveys of firms representing over 35% of the U.S. pharmaceutical market.

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS045147

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel