Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Celebrex Cardiovascular Safety Supported In FDA/Kaiser Study

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily

Executive Summary

FDA releases data from COX-2 cardiovascular safety study that was included in a Sept. 30 internal memo to Office of Drug Safety Director Seligman. The study shows Celebrex patients have lower cardiovascular safety risk compared to remote NSAID users.

An FDA/Kaiser Permanente retrospective study conducted on NSAIDs and COX-2s supports the cardiovascular safety of Pfizer's Celebrex (celecoxib).

The study, led by FDA Office of Drug Safety Associate Director for Science David Graham, MD, found a trend decrease in cardiovascular events among Celebrex patients compared to patients with remote exposure (treatment ending 60 days or more prior to the study) to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

A total of 126 acute myocardial infarction events were observed in patients taking Celebrex, for a relative risk compared to remote NSAID use of 0.86.

To put this into perspective, study results showed ibuprofen and naproxen had relative risks of 1.09 and 1.18, respectively.

Merck's Vioxx (rofecoxib)had a 1.29 relative risk at the lower dose (25 mg) and showed a 3.15-fold increase in risk at the higher dose (50 mg) compared to remote NSAID use.

The study also showed a 1.5-fold increase in risk for Vioxx compared to Celebrex at the 25 mg dose and a 3.7-fold increase at the 50 mg dose.

The study data were included in an 1 internal memo from Graham to Office of Drug Safety Acting Director Paul Seligman, MD. The report concludes with Graham's suggestion that both doses of Vioxx should be withdrawn (see 2 (Also see "FDA Memo Discussed Pulling Vioxx Based On HMO Study" - Pink Sheet, 3 Nov, 2004.)).

The FDA memo is dated Sept. 30, the same day Merck announced the voluntary worldwide withdrawal of Vioxx (3 (Also see "FDA Has One Month To Mull Approval Of Merck's Arcoxia Following Vioxx Withdrawal" - Pink Sheet, 30 Sep, 2004.)). FDA said the timing was coincidental.

FDA posted the memo on its website Nov. 2, and in a cover page stated that "the report has not been fully evaluated by the FDA and may not reflect official views of the agency. However, in light of the recent market withdrawal of Vioxx, FDA has decided to publicly release the document at this time."

Initial results of the study were first presented at the International Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology & Therapeutic Risk Management in August (4 (Also see "FDA/Kaiser Study Questions Merck's Vioxx Cardiovascular Safety" - Pink Sheet, 25 Aug, 2004.)).

Since the Vioxx withdrawal, there have been questions as to whether the cardiovascular safety profile should be considered a class effect.

FDA Acting Deputy Commissioner of Operations Janet Woodcock, MD, recently said no cardiovascular safety signal has been seen so far in Celebrex ("5 (Also see "Celebrex Database Clear Of Cardiovascular Signals, FDA’s Woodcock Says" - Pink Sheet, 29 Oct, 2004.)).

A study of Pfizer's follow-on COX-2 inhibitor Bextra (valdecoxib)showed an increased cardiovascular risk when used following coronary artery bypass graft surgery (6 (Also see "Pfizer Sees Increased Cardiovascular Risk With Bextra After Bypass Surgery" - Pink Sheet, 15 Oct, 2004.)).

- Lee Kalowski

Related Content

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS058250

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel