Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Macugen Advisory Committee To Discuss Concomitant Use With Visudyne

This article was originally published in The Pink Sheet Daily

Executive Summary

FDA's Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee will discuss concomitant use of Pfizer/Eyetech's Macugen and Novartis/QLT's Visudyne (verteporfin) at an Aug. 27 meeting

FDA's Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee will discuss concomitant use of Pfizer/Eyetech's Macugen and Novartis/QLT's Visudyne (verteporfin) at an Aug. 27 meeting.

The committee is meeting to consider Pfizer/Eyetech's NDA for Macugen (pegaptanib) for the treatment of neovasuclar or "wet" age-related muscular degeneration (AMD).

1 FDA briefing materials indicate the agency is asking the committee to consider: "Has the concomitant use of PDT therapy with pegaptanib been explored sufficiently?" and, "Are there concerns with using this product concomitantly with PDT therapy?"

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin is currently the only approved treatment for AMD, with an indication limited to patients with the predominantly classic form of the disease.

Macugen efficacy claims are based on two prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-masked, controlled trials with broad entry criteria for vision, lesion size and angiographic subtype.

I.V. injections of pegaptanib (.3 mg, 1 mg, or 3 mg) or sham injections were administered every six weeks for 48 weeks with a follow-up period to 54 weeks, totaling a maximum of nine injections.

Doctors were permitted to administer PDT in the indicated patient population based on their clinical judgment, but patients were not randomized to receive PDT. Therefore, an "inherent bias limits the interpretation of efficacy with and without it," Pfizer/Eyetech's briefing documents state.

The 2 sponsors' briefing documents state there was low usage of PDT during the study overall and "no evidence that PDT usage influenced the efficacy of pegaptanib."

The primary efficacy endpoint for the trials was the proportion of responders, defined as patients avoiding a 15-letter loss of visual acuity (3 (Also see "Pfizer/Eyetech's Macugen Safety To Be Discussed By FDA Advisory Cmte." - Pink Sheet, 25 Aug, 2004.)).

The sponsors' data also indicate a higher rate of ocular adverse reactions, including eye pain, punctuate keratitis and vitreous floaters, with concomitant PDT use.

- Andrew Shelton

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS060392

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel