DSHEA “Unreasonable Risk” Standard Does Not Require Proof Of Harm – FDA
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
FDA's legal burden in establishing that a dietary supplement should be banned does not include proving the substance caused harm, the agency states in a 1final rule scheduled for publication in the Feb. 11 Federal Register.
You may also be interested in...
Catch-22? Supplements May Be Trapped By FDA’s Risk/Benefit Standard
Some legal experts contend that a glass ceiling built into FDA's risk/benefit analysis of dietary supplements could leave certain products more vulnerable to regulatory scrutiny in the wake of the agency's outright ban of ephedra
Catch-22? Supplements May Be Trapped By FDA’s Risk/Benefit Standard
Some legal experts contend that a glass ceiling built into FDA's risk/benefit analysis of dietary supplements could leave certain products more vulnerable to regulatory scrutiny in the wake of the agency's outright ban of ephedra
Catch-22? Supplements May Be Trapped By FDA’s Risk/Benefit Standard
Some legal experts contend that a glass ceiling built into FDA's risk/benefit analysis of dietary supplements could leave certain products more vulnerable to regulatory scrutiny in the wake of the agency's outright ban of ephedra