Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Antioxidant disclaimers

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

"FDA has determined that although some scientific evidence suggests that consumption of antioxidant vitamins may reduce the risk of certain forms of cancer, this evidence is limited and not conclusive," reads one acceptable disclaimer crafted to accompany antioxidant health claim, agency tells Durk Pearson et al. in April 6 letter. Washington, D.C. federal court Judge Gladys Kessler directed FDA to permit the claim "consumption of antioxidant vitamins may reduce the risk of certain kinds of cancer" in a Dec. 26 opinion (1"The Tan Sheet" Jan. 6, 2003, p. 15). FDA has developed two other similar disclaimers that companies may use when opting to run the new health claim...

You may also be interested in...



FDA Antioxidants/Cancer Risk Reduction Claim Ban Found Unconstitutional

FDA's rejection of an antioxidants/cancer risk reduction health claim fails to satisfy the conditions that permit a ban of the claim because evidence exists supporting the relationship, according to a Dec. 26 Washington, D.C. federal court opinion

Sanofi Clinches Key Phase III Immunology Win With Rilzabrutinib

Sanofi’s BTK inhibitor – one of two from its 2021 Principia buy – passed a Phase III test in immune thrombocytopenia as the company focuses on Dupixent-like blockbusters going forward.

US FDA Gene Therapy Accelerated Approval Guidance Will Describe ‘Buckets’ Of Use Scenarios

Forthcoming guidance is expected to describe areas of “low-hanging fruit” and those that are more challenging for use of the expedited pathway, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Director Peter Marks said.

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS095302

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel