Prop 65 Andro Settlements Include “Corrective Advertising” Provision
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
Settling defendants in California's Prop 65 litigation against androstenedione supplement marketers would pay from $1,341 to $4,546 each to fund "corrective advertising" programs, according to proposed consent judgments filed in Oakland state court
You may also be interested in...
Prop 65 Steroid Suit Planned Against Supplements Named In Post
The Center for Environmental Health plans to file a Prop 65 suit in January against 19 dietary supplement manufacturers and retailers for selling products containing anabolic steroids without warning labels, the group announces in a recent notice letter
Prop 65 Steroid Suit Planned Against Supplements Named In Post
The Center for Environmental Health plans to file a Prop 65 suit in January against 19 dietary supplement manufacturers and retailers for selling products containing anabolic steroids without warning labels, the group announces in a recent notice letter
Prop 65 Steroid Suit Planned Against Supplements Named In Post
The Center for Environmental Health plans to file a Prop 65 suit in January against 19 dietary supplement manufacturers and retailers for selling products containing anabolic steroids without warning labels, the group announces in a recent notice letter