Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Quigley v. Gum Tech

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

Gum Tech's motion to dismiss a patent infringement lawsuit brought by Cold-Eeze lozenges manufacturer Quigley denied by a Philadelphia federal judge March 9. The court, interpreting the '465 patent to extend to "any method of applying zinc gluconate to the lining of the mouth, tongue and throat," found disputed issues of material fact exist as to whether Gum Tech's Zicam homeopathic nasal spray infringes the patent. Quigley filed suit in November against Gum Tech and associated entities (1"The Tan Sheet" Nov. 22, 1999, p. 9). The Philadelphia court will hear arguments March 31 on Quigley's request to preliminarily enjoin the defendants from infringing its patent. In court filings, Quigley asserts it will suffer irreparable harm, in the form of lost sales and market share, if Zicam continues to be sold

You may also be interested in...



Gel Tech Zicam Zinc Spray Patent Infringement Charged In Quigley Suit

The Quigley Corporation, manufacturer and marketer of the Cold-Eeze line of zinc lozenges, is alleging patent infringement against GumTech, Inc., GEL-Tech Industries and Gel Tech LLC related to their distribution of the Zicam homeopathic zinc nasal spray.

Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010

Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC

In Brief

Combe sells most of its OTC brands

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS091023

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel