Condom warnings
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
Statement clarifying that "contracting the human papilloma virus" can still occur "despite the use of condoms" would be required on all retail packages of condoms sold or distributed in California as of Jan. 1, 2001, under Assembly bill 2216 scheduled for hearing by the Committee on Health April 4. The state measure was introduced by Jim Battin (R) Feb. 24. On the federal level, an amendment to HR 1070 requiring HPV warnings to appear on condom labeling unanimously passed the House Commerce Committee on Oct. 29; the bill has yet to be considered on the floor (1"The Tan Sheet" Nov. 8, 1999, p. 9)
You may also be interested in...
Condom HPV Warning Would Be Required Under Cervical Cancer Bill
Condom labeling would be required to bear a warning that the devices do not provide adequate protection against the transmission of human papillomavirus (HPV) under an amendment to breast and cervical cancer treatment legislation pending in the House.
Supplement GMP Warning Letters Make Modest Debut In 2010
Finalization of a settlement between the Federal Trade Commission and Rexall Sundown regarding unsupported cellulite treatment claims for the firm's Cellasene dietary supplement hinges upon approval of two related class action settlements pending in California and Florida, according to FTC
In Brief
Combe sells most of its OTC brands