Whole Foods ‘Hypoallergenic’ Litigation To Test ‘Sensitizer’ Definition, Consumer Perceptions
This article is powered by The Rose Sheet
Executive Summary
A California federal judge has granted Whole Foods Market, Inc.’s motion to dismiss itself, all but one affiliate, and a number of plaintiff claims in the putative class action, but the core issue of contention – whether Whole Foods-branded “hypoallergenic” offerings are falsely labeled – remains to be litigated.
You may also be interested in...
Plaintiff Digs Deep In Almay Archives For ‘Hypoallergic’ Fraud Evidence
In the absence of FDA regulations, federal courts generally are weighing hypoallergenic false-advertising arguments against the “reasonable consumer” standard, with varying results. However, Almay may have provided a more substantive basis for assessing the truthfulness of its hypoallergenic claims via a letter to FDA on the subject – albeit one from 1973.
J&J Scores Early In ‘Hypoallergenic’ Case; Plaintiff’s Definition ‘Implausible,’ Court Says
A California federal judge is more receptive to J&J’s interpretation of “hypoallergenic” – as a term denoting reduced allergy risk compared with other products – than plaintiffs’ ingredient-based definition. Her ruling on the firm’s motion to dismiss differs sharply from a decision earlier this month in the same district concerning Whole Foods hypoallergenic claims, only adding to legal uncertainty.
Pollution Protection, Blue Light Defense Among Cosmetic Tests In High Demand
Craig Weiss, president of Consumer Product Testing Company, discussed trending cosmetics claims and testing that can be used to support them, as well as “claims that perhaps should not be made,” at ICMAD’s regulatory workshop in May.