Vanda Is 1-1 In Fights With FDA As Court Grants Its FOIA Request For Review Documents
Executive Summary
Court finds the agency and public would not be harmed if FDA turns over its clinical and statistical reviews of Vanda’s application for Hetlioz jet lag indication. Battles continue over FDA approval of generic Hetlioz and agency’s proposal to refuse the jet lag sNDA.
You may also be interested in...
Absence Of Braille In Generic Hetlioz Label Merits Its Withdrawal, Vanda Lawsuit Argues
Vanda complaint against US FDA says generic label is not the same as Hetlioz and omission of braille lettering will increase medication errors. Company seeks recall of Teva’s product.
Vanda Objects To FDA’s ‘Highly Prejudicial’ Hearing Process And ‘Extra-Regulatory’ Requirements
Vanda says FDA improperly requires it to disprove all alleged deficiencies in its Hetlioz application for jet lag. Contentious approach to notice of opportunity for hearing contrasts with that of Intarcia and Lexicon, which also seek hearings over FDA’s proposal to refuse their applications.
Vanda Sues US FDA For Documents Backing Complete Response For Hetlioz Jet Lag Indication
FOIA exemption does not apply to medical and statistical reviews of its sNDA, company claims. It says it needs the information to adapt its development program and determine if the agency made an error.