Real-World Evidence: Amylyx’s Use Of External Controls To Frame Relyvrio’s Survival Benefit Rife With Problems
The post hoc comparison of an exploratory, long-term survival benefit in the CENTAUR trial to historical controls in two ALS patient databases lacked prespecification and a common treatment protocol, and potential differences in prognostic factors may have confounded the results.
You may also be interested in...
External Controls: FDA Guidance Provides Clarity But Does Little To Remove Hurdles
Agency discourages use of externally controlled trials in all but a very limited number of situations truly ripe for such an approach; new draft guidance discusses at length the various confounding factors that can introduce bias into a comparison between an investigational treatment and an external control using either real-world data or data from another clinical trial.
What ‘Confirmatory Evidence’ Does US FDA Need When Sponsors Want To Rely On A Single Trial?
Amylyx’s Relyvrio survival data, drawn from a post hoc exploratory survival analysis of randomized patients, and the primary ALS functional endpoint ‘capture distinct concepts,’ FDA states. Use of long-term survival data from the same trial as confirmatory evidence was unusual, but not unique.
RWE’s Biggest Role In US FDA Approvals: External Controls For Breakthrough Rare Disease Therapies
Despite broad interest, real-world evidence of efficacy in FDA decisions remains largely limited to orphan diseases and natural history, a Pink Sheet analysis shows.