Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

CDER Opposes Covis’ Bid To Steer Focus Away From Makena's Failed Confirmatory Trial

Executive Summary

The company offered to stipulate that findings from the PROLONG trial do not verify clinical benefit of the preterm birth prevention drug; the US FDA’s drugs center opposed a stipulation, saying failure of a confirmatory trial to verify clinical benefit is an independent ground for withdrawing accelerated approval and an advisory committee should vote on the question.

You may also be interested in...



Makena Hearing: Covis Seeks To Skip Question, Likely Negative Vote On Confirmatory Trial Results

By proposing to stipulate that findings from the PROLONG study do not verify Makena’s clinical benefit on neonatal morbidity and mortality from complications of preterm birth, Covis could avoid what would likely be a highly negative vote on the first question posed to the advisory committee at the 17-19 October public hearing on withdrawal of the application.

Makena Withdrawal Hearing: US FDA Drugs Center, Covis Tussle Over Panel Composition

Practicing obstetricians who are maternal fetal-medicine specialists should make up a ‘significant proportion’ of the advisory committee at the forthcoming hearing, Covis says; CDER calls for a more ‘balanced’ panel that includes expertise in biostatistics, neonatology and epidemiology.

Makena Withdrawal Dilemma: Advisory Cmte. Split Offers No Clear Direction For US FDA

Nine of 16 advisory committee members favored withdrawal of AMAG’s preterm birth drug because substantial evidence of efficacy is lacking and clinical benefit has not been confirmed; seven panelists favored keeping the drug on the market but requiring a new trial.

Topics

Related Companies

Latest News
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS146801

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel