Makena Accelerated Approval Withdrawal Hearing Should Be In-Person, Covis Tells US FDA
Executive Summary
Covis cites challenges of conducting virtual meetings but leaves door open to hybrid approach. CDER wants advisory committee vote on feasibility of timely conducting new adequate, well-controlled trial, while Covis seeks vote on whether withdrawal is appropriate given absence of another approved drug for preventing preterm birth.
You may also be interested in...
Makena Hearing: Covis Seeks To Skip Question, Likely Negative Vote On Confirmatory Trial Results
By proposing to stipulate that findings from the PROLONG study do not verify Makena’s clinical benefit on neonatal morbidity and mortality from complications of preterm birth, Covis could avoid what would likely be a highly negative vote on the first question posed to the advisory committee at the 17-19 October public hearing on withdrawal of the application.
Makena Accelerated Approval Hearing Will Be Virtual, Likely In September Or October
Presiding officer Celia Witten denies Covis’ request for an in-person hearing, saying it is unclear at this time how COVID would affect a proceeding in the fall. Hearing agenda spans two-and-a-half days and is modeled, in part, on the Avastin hearing, but with twice the time for public comment.
Accelerated Approval: Makena Real-World Evidence Insufficient To Verify Clinical Benefit, CDER Says
Covis seeks to discuss study proposals and other accelerated approval precedents at still-unscheduled withdrawal hearing; CDER says company’s current RWE proposal is inadequate given its design and the failure of the PROLONG confirmatory clinical trial.