‘Skinny Label’ Litigation: Generic Firms Rethinking Strategy, May Pursue Legislation
Generic manufacturers are being cautious on label carve-outs to avoid claims of induced infringement. Bright line rules are necessary, attorney says, and if GSK v. Teva decision is not reversed, legislation will be needed to preserve skinny label. Insurers also face potential liability for placement of skinny-label generics on formularies.
You may also be interested in...
Teva’s carve-out fight with GSK over generic Coreg will see the Solicitor General weigh in. Amgen and Juno’s patent petitions remain pending, and the high court stays a Federal Circuit decision invalidating Novartis’ Gilenya patent.
Supreme Court nominee issued three decisions on Hatch-Waxman regime as district court judge, including case in which she ruled against the FDA’s denial of orphan drug designation and another in which she deferred to the agency’s view on exclusivity. Her analysis of facts may play a role if the court takes up a case on administrative agency deference.
Split appeals court denies en banc review of GSK v. Teva ruling, but suggests the district court could consider GSK’s patent declarations in determining whether Teva’s label is evidence of inducement to infringe. Teva plans to file petition for Supreme Court review.