340B Court Ruling Offers Manufacturers Short-Term Reprieve In Contract Pharmacy Dispute
Federal court vacates enforcement letter to Lilly from HRSA, but the decision was not completely favorable to pharma. It also offers the view that the law does not allow manufacturers to restrict 340B discounts to hospitals using multiple contract pharmacies.
You may also be interested in...
Pharma Gets 340B Appeals Court Victory But More Decisions Are Pending; Will Congress Step In?
Third Circuit is first of three federal appeals courts to issue a decision in multiple lawsuits over drug companies’ 340B contract pharmacy restrictions, which have led to conflicting lower court rulings on whether such restrictions are unlawful.
340B Contract Pharmacy Restrictions Slowed Program’s 2021 Spending Trajectory, But Not Much
Manufacturer restrictions on discounts to contract pharmacies may have depressed sales for 340B-discounted diabetes drugs in 2021. But sales in other categories, including oncology, immunology and arthritis drugs, were up by 20% to 40%.
US 340B Discount Restrictions By Pharma: HRSA Will Continue To ‘Walk The Walk’ In Opposition
Biden Administration officials pledge ongoing efforts to thwart manufacturer restrictions on 340B drug discounts, but at the same time urge hospitals to be more transparent about how they use the savings.