Accelerated Approval: US FDA Wants Comprehensive Development Plan From Oncology Sponsors
Executive Summary
Cancer drug developers should come to the agency early with a package of clinical trials to support accelerated approval and confirm clinical benefit rather than with plans to sequentially conduct such studies, Oncology Center of Excellence’s Richard Pazdur says; he also suggests closer scrutiny ahead of whether postmarketing trials are being conducted with ‘due diligence.’
You may also be interested in...
‘On-And Off-Ramps’ For Cancer Accelerated Approvals: FDA Suggests Earlier Randomized Trials
Leaders of FDA’s oncology center say sponsors could initiate a single randomized trial prior to receiving accelerated approval or conduct a single-group AA study concurrently with a randomized trial. FDA and sponsor could agree in advance on criteria for approval and withdrawal.
Accelerated Approvals Convert Much Faster If Confirmatory Trial Already Underway, FDA Cancer Data Shows
Oncology Center of Excellence’s ‘Project Confirm’ finds that if a confirmatory trial is ongoing at the time of accelerated approval, conversion to regular approval takes an average of three years versus 4.9 years if the trial starts after AA.
Cancer And Accelerated Approval: FDA To Crack Down On Single-Arm Trials, Refractory Disease Focus
US FDA cancer chief Rick Pazdur plans to send industry to ‘rehab’ with Project Frontrunner, which will push for development of cancer drugs in randomized controlled trials in earlier disease. Goal is to reduce time of uncertainty between accelerated approval and confirmatory evidence.