Cancer Trials: Beware Of ‘Digital Exhaust’ When Planning Clinical Outcome Assessments
Executive Summary
Patient data gathered through wearables and sensors can complement traditional patient-reported outcome assessments, but continuous digital monitoring runs the risk of overburdening clinical trial participants.
You may also be interested in...
Standardization Of Patient-Focused Core Clinical Outcomes Could Enable Labeling Comparisons
US FDA’s Theresa Mullin envisions having a national catalog of standard core clinical outcomes assessment measures that could apply to every disease area.
Cancer Trials: Patient-Reported Outcomes Should Measure Five Core Concepts, US FDA Says
Heterogeneity in PRO assessment strategies has lessened the regulatory utility of such data from cancer trials, the agency says; new draft guidance recommends systematic assessment of a core set of PROs in registrational studies using fit-for-purpose tools and includes examples of acceptable instruments.
Rare Diseases: CBER Looks To ‘Lean Into’ Accelerated Approval, Align More With CDER
US FDA biologics center officials spoke about their efforts to increase collaboration and harmonization with the drugs center, and to internally involve more review disciplines in evaluating biomarker evidence, during a Reagan-Udall Foundation meeting that weighed potential use of accelerated approval for neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidoses disorders.