Aduhelm’s ‘Complex’ Circumstances Drove Extensive In-House Advice Process Before Accelerated Approval, Cavazzoni Says
Executive Summary
Accelerated approval was considered as option in response to the negative advisory committee vote, but it was not a ‘default,’ CDER officials say. ‘It fit like a glove.’
You may also be interested in...
Leqembi Phase II Missed Clinical Endpoint But Still Provided Support For Amyloid Surrogate
Pink Sheet's Drug Review Profile digs into the FDA memos on Eisai/Biogen’s lecanemab; Phase II clinical efficacy results were reviewed for whether they supported the likelihood of amyloid plaque reduction to predict clinical benefit, rather than whether they directly provided substantial evidence of effectiveness.
Eisai’s Lecanemab: US FDA Showed Flexibility On Clinical Endpoint Results, Safety Database Size
Alzheimer’s drug’s failure to meet Phase II endpoint did not preclude accelerated approval in light of statistically significant reduction in amyloid plaque and ‘generally consistent and favorable results on clinical endpoints.’ Size of six-month safety database also fell shy of ICH guidelines.
Accelerated Approval: Mid-Review Decisions ‘Not The Norm’ But Will Continue, FDA’s Cavazzoni says
Without directly referencing the agency’s controversial approval of Biogen’s Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm, CDER director Patrizia Cavazzoni defended US FDA’s ability to decide on use of the expedited pathway during an application review, while also stressing the need for earlier planning on evidence generation and confirmatory trials.