US Supreme Court Gives PTO Director Chance To Impact Outcome Of Patent Disputes
High court finds PTAB judges were unconstitutionally appointed; ruling is unlikely to benefit one party over another in inter partes review proceedings, attorneys say, but that could depend on the director. PTO is expected to provide guidance on how and when to request review of Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions.
You may also be interested in...
Supreme Court nominee issued three decisions on Hatch-Waxman regime as district court judge, including case in which she ruled against the FDA’s denial of orphan drug designation and another in which she deferred to the agency’s view on exclusivity. Her analysis of facts may play a role if the court takes up a case on administrative agency deference.
Intellectual property became front page news in 2021 as the pandemic ignited a debate on the role of patents in accessing COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics. 2022 will see a decision on the TRIPS waiver, a new USPTO director, and action on a pending march-in petition.
Members of Congress, companies and government agencies want the Patent Office to change policies that they say impede generic drug competition. The latest effort is focused on PTO’s discretionary denial of inter partes review petitions, which is the subject of a bipartisan congressional letter and cert petition to the US Supreme Court.