Pfizer’s Tanezumab REMS Faces US FDA Doubts Heading Into Panel Review
Measures aimed at mitigating risk of progressive joint damage with the first-in-class nerve growth factor inhibitor may not be clinically feasible to implement or prevent rapid progression of osteoarthritis, FDA reviewers say; agency briefing document describes efficacy as 'modest' and says the sponsor's patient preference study was flawed and 'uninformative.'
You may also be interested in...
Patient Preference Data: Pfizer’s Tanezumab Study Had ‘Flaws’ That Made It ‘Uninformative’
Study showed osteoarthritis patients are more willing to accept risk of joint damage with NGF-inhibitors than dependency associated with opioids, Pfizer said; however, FDA highlighted key flaws in study design, sample population and survey content.
Pfizer’s Tanezumab REMS Cannot Make Benefit-Risk Positive, US FDA Panel Says
Panelists say REMS would need data on long-term safety and progression of joint damage after discontinuation. In 19-1 vote, advisory committee concludes proposed Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy will not ensure the anti-nerve growth factor’s modest benefits outweigh risks of joint destruction in osteoarthritis patients.
Pfizer/Lilly Had Big Ambitions For Tanezumab; Are They Finally Dashed?
Given serious safety questions with tanezumab, the US filing seemed like throwing a Hail Mary; two FDA advisory panels overwhelmingly rejected the proposed risk management plan.