What Did US FDA Do Wrong In Its Review Of Aducanumab? AdCom Members Have A List
Executive Summary
Committee members rebuked FDA for its positive review of Biogen’s Alzheimer’s disease drug, objecting to its ‘terrifically one-sided’ analysis of data, the short shrift given the contrary conclusions of its own statistician, and its interpretation of a dosing study to support the sole positive Phase III study.
You may also be interested in...
Eye On ODAC: Former Members, FDA’s Pazdur Talk Pre-Meeting Mindsets, Impact Of Sponsor’s Experts
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee reps and the Oncology Center of Excellence director go behind the scenes to discuss FDA interactions with panelists, how opinions can change during a meeting, and why the voting question is important.
Point-Counterpoint: US FDA Adcomm Joint Briefing Document Likely Limited To Oncology For Now
Oncology Center of Excellence Director Richard Pazdur wants to make the single, joint backgrounder standard for Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meetings; former Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs adcomm member Caleb Alexander says the joint document is risky, citing the negative experience with Biogen's Aduhelm.
Aduhelm’s Goodbye: ENVISION Confirmatory Study To End In May, With BLA Withdrawal In November
Biogen faces complex logistics in shutting down a multinational trial with more than 200 sites and approximately 1,000 patients enrolled; company also is facing calls to publish data collected from the unfinished study as well as other aducanumab trials.