Gene Therapy Approval Standards: Available Treatments Influence US FDA’s View On Durability
CBER’s Peter Marks says agency assesses the importance of durability of effect differently for a gene therapy that treats a disease that has no other available therapies versus a condition for which there are multiple approved treatments. Marks’ comments shed more light on the complete response letter for BioMarin’s hemophilia gene therapy Roctavian.
You may also be interested in...
US FDA’s expedited pathway remains alive and well in oncology, but ‘dangling’ indications may be subject to more regular public scrutiny going forward; negative votes for two of six indications reflected the influence of Oncology Center of Excellence director Richard Pazdur.
Measure clarifies the meaning of new chemical entity by replacing the term ‘active ingredient,’ which encompasses esters and salts, with ‘active moiety’ as defined by the FDA; legal experts are skeptical the measure will generate cost savings and say it gives the agency wide latitude to make future changes in eligibility for 5-year exclusivity.
Citing changing therapeutic landscape and doubts about utility of checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in this setting, advisory committee votes 6-2 against maintaining PD-1 inhibitor’s accelerated approval for third-line treatment of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.