Missing Data: One Long-Term Lesson From US FDA Action On Hydroxychloroquine
Executive Summary
Politicization of COVID-19 treatments is one of the unexpected wrinkles amid an unprecedented pandemic. But one lesson from the hydroxychloroquine experience in the US is more typical if still troubling: almost no one followed the rules on reporting follow-up data.
You may also be interested in...
Shared Control: Novel Trial Design Works In COVID, But Will Sponsors Buy In?
COVID-19 has helped demonstrate the viability of platform trials with a shared control arm. That model is easier to extol than it is for sponsors to embrace, especially outside of crisis mode.
Italy Opens Up On Trial Woes In A Pandemic
Italian medicines agency chief Nicola Magrini recounts the problems AIFA faced and the lessons it learned through its work at the height of the coronavirus outbreak in Italy.
Hydroxychloroquine EUA Is First Rx Victim Of Hahn’s ‘Move Fast, Course Correct’ Philosophy
US FDA's decision to revoke the COVID-19 emergency use authorization for two anti-malarial drugs keeps with commissioner Hahn's stated goal of moving fast to tackle the pandemic, but shifting course as new data comes available. FDA cited new evidence as well as a reanalysis of the data it initially based the EUA on as reasons for pulling the authorization. Meanwhile, HHS Secretary Alex Azar appeared to equate the EUA revocation as opening the doors for broader use of the medicine, potentially undermining FDA's own communication on the drug, in yet another example of political leaders complicating the science and public health response to COVID-19.