Supreme Court Takes Pass on Clarifying Patent Eligibility, Disappointing BioPharma
Executive Summary
Industry now needs to wait for a more appealing appeal or a revived legislative effort after the high court declines review of Athena Diagnostics v. Mayo Collaborative Services, which created a sharp divide in the Federal Circuit, and Hikma v. Vanda; biopharma and others contend eligibility issue is biggest problem in patent system.
You may also be interested in...
Patent Eligibility Bill May Carve Out Patenting Of Research
Witnesses at US Senate hearings debate bill's impact on drug pricing; discuss limiting it to medical diagnostics.
Federal Circuit Tosses Diagnostic Patent, Spurring Biopharma Calls For Congressional Action
A divided panel finds Athena Diagnostics' patent on method to diagnose myasthenia gravis is invalid; in dissent, Judge Newman cites industry concerns that the decision will deter development of new diagnostic methods.
Seeking To Provide ‘The Best Clarity Possible,’ ACIP Votes For COVID Vaccine Booster In Children 5-11
CDC advisory committee recommends Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine booster, but one member votes ‘no,’ citing concern that only 29% of children ages 5 to 11 have received the primary two-dose series and arguing the focus should be on additional vaccinations, not additional doses.