California's Pay-For-Delay Law May Be Harsher Than FTC Regulation, Could Face Legal Challenge
Executive Summary
Governor Newsom signs bill that presumes brand-generic patent settlements are anticompetitive; AAM says the law violates US Constitution by attempting to regulate transactions outside the state.
You may also be interested in...
Biden’s HHS Pick Sought ‘March In’ Rights For Veklury; Targeted AbbVie ‘Pay For Delay’ Tactics
California attorney general Xavier Becerra has sought to lower drug prices in California as part of a broader focus on health care costs, an approach he may bring to a new role in the Biden Administration.
AAM Slams California Pay-For-Delay Ban
US off-patent industry association the AAM has blasted as unconstitutional a groundbreaking California law banning so-called ‘pay-for-delay’ deals under which brand companies pay rivals to keep generics off the market.
Who Is The Best Minor League Player In The Drug Pricing Debate?
Now that the Senate Finance Committee has unveiled its bill and House leadership has outlined its approach, less comprehensive drug pricing legislation is losing the limelight. But may of the the bills could still have a meaningful impact on pharma, and might even become law, if only because they would be an easier way for politicians to show they were doing something to address the issue.
Need a specific report? 1000+ reports available
Buy Reports
Register for our free email digests: