Real-World Evidence: Sponsors Look To US FDA Drug Reviews For Potential Pitfalls
Methodological problems with RWE submissions for approved applications may give sponsors ‘a little bit of a pause’ as they work through data selection and analytical issues, Aetion’s Jeremy Rassen says. CDER’s Janet Woodcock says it is easier to use RWE when treatment effects are large.
You may also be interested in...
RWE’s Biggest Role In US FDA Approvals: External Controls For Breakthrough Rare Disease Therapies
Despite broad interest, real-world evidence of efficacy in FDA decisions remains largely limited to orphan diseases and natural history, a Pink Sheet analysis shows.
Real-World Evidence More Helpful To US FDA In Cases Of High Clinical Trial Efficacy
Pfizer-funded systematic review of approved oncology applications that contained RWE highlights common deficiencies flagged by FDA and says strength of trial data is a key determinant of the extent to which RWE is needed and considered by the agency.
Real-World Evidence: Epizyme’s Epithelioid Sarcoma Natural History Study Falls Flat At US FDA
Sponsor had hoped to use retrospective case review study as an external control arm to support regular approval of tazemetostat; US FDA not only rejected this idea, it found the study design so flawed that it did not consider the results in its efficacy assessment for accelerated approval.