Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

Pharmaceutical Groups Urge FDA To Upgrade From NDC To GTIN To Avoid Conflicts With DSCSA

Executive Summary

Pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors complain that FDA’s plan to add digits to the NDC would be a mistake and could potentially conflict with global standards as well as the bar code technology systems put into place under the Drug Supply Chain Security Act. They suggest embedding the NDC into the GS1 Global Trade Identification number (GTIN) to avoid these conflicts.

You may also be interested in...



Serialization Update: Industry Warns Of “Significant Disruptions” If FDA Bars Use Of GSI Global Numbers Under DSCSA

The pharmaceutical industry has already been using GTIN numbers on product packaging to comply with pending serialization requirements and US FDA’s plan to replace the GTIN with the NDC code is drawing much criticism. 

The Quality Lowdown: A Week Of International Intrigue

Or perhaps it's been a week of intriguing international events in global drug quality, as an international group works to ratchet up global standards, regulators aim to ease the coming UK/EU divorce and the US and China play their hands in a tariff poker match. Meanwhile, US FDA looks to avert labeler code crisis, Quebec API firm comes clean about missing identity testing, and US firm recalls drug product based on FDA’s API supplier inspection findings.

Program Participants Urge The FDA To Adopt Some Pharmaceutical Quality Metrics And Avoid Others

Site-based metrics praised; lot acceptance rates, invalidated OOS rates discouraged. Agency official admits some proposed metrics were “not the best.”

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS124577

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel