External Control Arms: Better Than Single-Arm Studies But No Replacement For Randomization
Executive Summary
Synthetic control group derived from historical clinical trial data could augment smaller randomized trials and yield better information than single-arm studies, but this approach should not be viewed as a substitute for randomized trials where feasible, US FDA officials said at a Friends of Cancer Research meeting.
You may also be interested in...
Validation Issues Could Dull Synthetic Data Benefits
Is it real, or is it synthetic? When it comes to drug development data in the future, the answer could be the latter. Datasets that replicate the statistical patterns of real patient populations but carry no risk of privacy disclosures could enable the use of synthetic control arms. However, the biopharma industry and regulators will need assurance that these datasets accurately reflect the population from which they were derived.
Real-World Evidence: US FDA Framework Emphasizes Data Fitness And Study Quality
Agency’s approach to assessing real-world evidence for effectiveness will be guided by three key principles: fitness for use of the underlying data, adequacy of the study design, and satisfactory monitoring and data collection.
Rare Diseases: CBER Looks To ‘Lean Into’ Accelerated Approval, Align More With CDER
US FDA biologics center officials spoke about their efforts to increase collaboration and harmonization with the drugs center, and to internally involve more review disciplines in evaluating biomarker evidence, during a Reagan-Udall Foundation meeting that weighed potential use of accelerated approval for neuronopathic mucopolysaccharidoses disorders.