Tearing Down The Goalposts (Part 3): “Was It Worth It”?
Executive Summary
When US FDA adopted new outcomes standards for novel diabetes drugs in 2008, there were dire warnings that it would kill product development for the disease. When an advisory committee revisited the issue in 2018, however, there was almost unanimous agreement that the guidelines have been positive. Almost.
You may also be interested in...
Diabetes Drugs: Longer, Broader Phase II/III Trials Could Replace CV Outcomes Trials, US Panel Says
Premarketing trials that enroll more diverse patient populations and include targeted CV endpoint collection over longer periods of time could be sufficient to allow new type 2 diabetes drugs to reach market without need for a dedicated safety study, advisory committee members say, urging FDA to move away from current two-step approach to cardiovascular risk assessments.
Diabetes Outcomes Trial Requirement Looks 'Increasingly Wise' – FDA’s Temple
FDA’s review of novel efficacy endpoints for diabetes therapies inevitably included discussion of the future of the cardiovascular outcomes study requirement for type 2 diabetes therapies; comments by FDA and EMA officials sure make it sound like the requirement isn’t going away any time soon.
US FDA Alzheimer Guidance Update Reflects Changes In Biomarkers – And Leadership
Latest update to draft guidance on early Alzheimer’s drug development is the third iteration of a document first published in 2013. The history of the guidance is a reflection of structural and leadership changes in the neurology review team at FDA.