Learning To Love The “CFL”: US FDA’s New Communication Policy
Executive Summary
Final guidance on communication “consistent with the label” is noteworthy for how closely it follows Obama-era draft. That may be a surprising twist given the background of the Trump-era FDA Commissioner and HHS Secretary – but on balance is probably the best possible approach for maintaining the current FDA approval climate.
You may also be interested in...
US FDA’s First Amendment Defense
Before taking over the US health department, Alex Azar helped bring landmark litigation challenging the scope of FDA’s regulatory authority under the First Amendment. Now his tenure is ending with a First Amendment defense of the agency.
Comparative Claims: CFL Guidance Gives Opening; OPDP Research May Close It
US FDA’s 'consistent with labeling' guidance prompts more sponsors to consider comparative promotional claims, but any minimization of product safety issues still runs the risk of enforcement, legal experts say; Office of Prescription Drug Promotion’s research agenda on consumer understanding of Rx ad claims could result in an attempt to limit comparative claims.
'Off-Label' Communications That Are Still 'Consistent' With Labeling Get Better Defined
US FDA's final guidance provides more examples of data that meets the 'scientifically appropriate and statistically sound' standard.