Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

US FDA's Biosimilars Program: Five Years In, Complete Response Letters Still Outnumber Approvals

Executive Summary

Agency is meeting its review timelines for biosimilar applications but handing our more complete response letters than first-cycle approvals; sponsors have publicly disclosed 24 original biosimilar application submissions to the agency since the review program began in fiscal year 2013, with 10 product approvals to date and at least 13 CRLs, according to the Pink Sheet's biosimilars report card.

You may also be interested in...



FDA's Biosimilars Meeting Management Should Improve After Reorg In New Drug Office

US FDA met more biosimilar user fee program meeting performance goals in FY 2018 compared to prior year but still fell short in scheduling for three of five types of meetings. Office of New Drugs reorganization, once completed, should address some logistical scheduling issues.

Mylan’s Fulphila: First Neulasta Biosimilar’s Road To US Market Slowed Only By Product Quality, GMP Deficiencies

Mylan demonstrated analytical similarity, including for the PEG moiety, and the absence of clinically meaningful differences between MYL-1401H and Amgen’s pegfilgrastim during first review cycle, but it had to resubmit the application after FDA flagged concerns about the biosimilar’s manufacturing process and ongoing facility deficiencies.

Mylan’s Fulphila: First Neulasta Biosimilar’s Road To US Market Slowed Only By Product Quality, GMP Deficiencies

Mylan demonstrated analytical similarity, including for the PEG moiety, and the absence of clinically meaningful differences between MYL-1401H and Amgen’s pegfilgrastim during first review cycle, but it had to resubmit the application after FDA flagged concerns about the biosimilar’s manufacturing process and ongoing facility deficiencies.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS123179

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel