Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

US FDA Approval Versus Patient Access: A Real-World Anecdote

Executive Summary

During meeting on real-world evidence, FDA’s Bob Temple describes real-world problem of patient access: his struggles to convince his insurer to cover Lilly/BI's diabetes drug Jardiance – which he helped review.  

Sometimes, US FDA officials have to fight with insurers for their medicines just like everybody else.

Center for Drug Evaluation & Research Deputy Director for Clinical Science Bob Temple offered a personal example of that reality during a National Academy of Sciences, Engineering & Medicine workshop on Real World Evidence March 6-7.

In the context of discussions about the way payors uses evidence to supplement – or contravene – regulatory decisions, Temple reported his own challenge in convincing his insurer to cover Eli Lilly & Co./Boehringer Ingelheim GMBH's Jardiance (empagliflozin) – even though the drug has an FDA approved cardiovascular outcomes claim.

Temple, of course, knows all about that claim since he played a key role in shepherding the application through an at times skeptical FDA advisory committee review and on to approval. (Also see "Can A Safety Study Support A Superiority Claim? Barely, US FDA Advisors Say" - Pink Sheet, 4 Jul, 2016.)

“The empaglifozin study, which showed pretty impressive results, was in a pretty typical diabetic population,” Temple said. “If I were a payor, I am not sure I would apply it to non-diabetics – although you can make an argument that it might.”

“But the people who were in it were on other drugs, and they added this. It is $10k a year or something and my health care plan makes it very hard to get it. I finally managed by yelling at them a lot. They didn’t make it easy.”

Former FDA Commissioner Robert Califf was struck by Temple’s anecdote and returned to it later in the meeting: “I am still reeling from the thought of Dr. Temple talking to his pharmaceutical benefits manager about access to the drug that he approved.”

Temple, by the way, said the story had a happy ending. The drug “had a pretty good effect.”

Maybe next up will be a celebrity endorsement deal?

From the editors of the RPM Report

Topics

Related Companies

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS122777

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel