Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Amgen v. Sandoz: Next Biosimilar Bout Begins Over State Law Claims

Executive Summary

In the ongoing Zarxio dispute, US appeals court takes up question left open by Supreme Court as to whether innovator company can seek remedy under state law if a biosimilar sponsor does not engage in the "patent dance" by providing its application and manufacturing information.

You may also be interested in...



US Supreme Court Permits Earlier Biosimilar Launches; Penalty For Declining Patent Dance Uncertain

Court says biosimilar sponsors may provide 180-day notice of marketing prior to FDA approval; Federal Circuit to decide if innovators can seek an injunction under state law if sponsors do not provide application and manufacturing information; Justice Breyer offers FDA invitation to weigh in.

FDA's Worst Case Scenario: Supreme Court Might Defer To It On Biosimilars

During oral arguments in Sandoz v Amgen, justices suggest FDA issue rule-making on whether biosimilar sponsors can give early notification of launches and need to follow all the steps in the patent dance. The agency has explicitly said it wants to be left out of it.

Biosimilar sponsors can avoid 'patent dance' in US, but innovators win extra exclusivity

Biosimilar sponsors won a partial victory in the battle over the meaning of the US biosimilars statute as an appeals court found that the patent exchange process laid out in the law is optional1. But avoiding the disclosure and negotiation procedures or 'patent dance' in the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act opens them up to litigation over a larger number of patents, which could be problematic for biosimilars of newer biologics.

Topics

Related Companies

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

MT101489

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel