Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

US Comparator Requirement For Interchangeable Biosimilars Would Hurt Industry

Executive Summary

US FDA’s recommendation against use of foreign-licensed reference products in clinical switching studies would result in procurement challenges and higher costs for biosimilar developers while also limiting where such studies could be conducted, some companies say.

You may also be interested in...



Biosimilar Interchangeability Switching Studies May Use Foreign Comparators, US FDA Says

But scientific bridging required for non-US reference products might be more extensive than in other contexts, agency cautions; easing of the US comparator-only recommendation is one of several changes from the 2017 draft guidance that could make pursuing an interchangeability designation easier.

Biosimilar Bridging Study Waivers: Public Health Prerogative Or Trade Secret ‘Taking’?

US FDA and PhRMA may be headed for showdown over use of foreign reference product bridging studies; PhRMA says that relying on sponsor’s non-public information to waive bridging studies  would violate firm’s commercial confidential information, while FDA Commissioner Gottlieb sees ‘public health prerogative’ in considering whether data-sharing agreements with foreign regulators could help eliminate need for unnecessary studies.

Biosimilar Bridging Study Waivers: Public Health Prerogative Or Trade Secret ‘Taking’?

US FDA and PhRMA may be headed for showdown over use of foreign reference product bridging studies; PhRMA says that relying on sponsor’s non-public information to waive bridging studies  would violate firm’s commercial confidential information, while FDA Commissioner Gottlieb sees ‘public health prerogative’ in considering whether data-sharing agreements with foreign regulators could help eliminate need for unnecessary studies.

Related Content

Topics

Related Companies

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

ID1132115

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel