FDA’s Burden Estimate On Biologic Naming Ignores Downstream Costs, Critics Say
Executive Summary
Costs across the US healthcare system of implementing new suffix-based nomenclature could reach into the billions, stakeholders say in requesting the Office of Management and Budget delay implementation of FDA’s final guidance on nonproprietary naming of biologics pending further analysis.
You may also be interested in...
FDA Biosimilars Acting Director Yim Is ‘Not A Great Fan’ Of Suffix-Based Naming Policy
Whether one accepts the view that concerns about active pharmacovigilance and the need to distinguish small molecules from biologics support the controversial nomenclature system is ‘a personal thing,’ Sarah Yim says.
US FDA Biosimilars Acting Director Yim ‘Not A Great Fan’ Of Suffix-Based Naming Policy
Whether one accepts the view that concerns about active pharmacovigilance and the need to distinguish small molecules from biologics support the controversial nomenclature system is ‘a personal thing,’ Sarah Yim says.
Woodcock: Concerns About US FDA's Biosimilars Suffix Policy Detached From Reality
In an exclusive interview, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Director Janet Woodcock contends that industry concerns about FDA's new suffix policy aren't reflective of real-world problems.