Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

EMA posts new Q&A on pharmacovigilance implementing rules

This article was originally published in SRA

The European Medicines Agency has issued an updated question and answer document on pharmacovigilance requirements for human drugs (EudraLex Volume 9A)1,2. The revised document (version 5.4), issued on 29 March, is applicable to all stakeholders exchanging individual case safety reports electronically within the European Economic Area.

The updated document supersedes version 3.2 published in October 2008 and contains new questions and answers (38 to 64) dealing with a range of pharmacovigilance issues. It explains, for example, what is requested in terms of re-testing when company databases are upgraded or modified and whether marketing authorisation holders are expected to update terms in the Medical Dictionary for Drug Regulatory Affairs (MedDRA) described in a submitted EU risk management plan with every release of the dictionary.

Also, it elaborates on what a marketing authorisation holder should do when the medicinal product manufacturer informs it about a reaction occurring with the concerned medicinal product. Specifically, it explains how the case should be handled when it occurs in a country where the MAH does not hold a marketing authorisation for the concerned medicinal product and whether the case should be considered for expedited/periodic reporting.

In the document, the EMA also explains what a company should do if it identifies valid individual case safety reports on internet websites, such as blogs and forums, but the minimum information for processing the cases is not available – for example, the country of the primary source is missing. In such situations, it explains what convention should be used for providing information regarding the country.

References

1. EMA, EudraLex – Volume 9A – Questions and answers on implementation: Version 5.4 (EMA/46003/2011), 29 March 2011, www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_procedural_guideline/2011/03/WC500104368.pdf

2. EudraLex Volume 9A of The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union, Guidelines on Pharmacovigilance for Medicinal Products for Human Use, September 2008, http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-9/pdf/vol9a_09-2008_en.pdf

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS116073

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel