Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

In Vitro Diagnostics

This article was originally published in SRA

Executive Summary

US FDA releases guidance on allowing waivers under CLIA

US FDA releases guidance on allowing waivers under CLIA

The US Food and Drug Administration has revised its recommended approach on how manufacturers of simple and low-risk in vitro diagnostic devices can demonstrate that their products are eligible for a waiver under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments Act1,2.

Under the CLIA, all clinical laboratories are required to obtain a certificate from the secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services before accepting materials derived from the human body for testing. Labs that perform only tests that are simple and have an “insignificant risk of an erroneous result” may obtain a certificate of waiver.

The FDA has the authority to ascertain the risk-factor of tests, and the advice contained in a recently finalised guidance entitled Recommendations for Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Waiver Applications for Manufacturers of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices is intended to guide manufacturers on what data they need to provide in support of their waiver application. The recommendations are based on the agency's interpretation of the law, its experience with CLIA complexity determinations and comments from stakeholders on the draft version issued in 2005.

The guidance allows for additional supplementation of actual patient specimens in the clinical study with alternative samples, preferably banked patient samples. In cases where neither patient specimens nor banked samples are available, studies may be supplemented with other types of prepared samples, for example spiked or diluted samples that mimic patient samples in terms of analyte and matrix.

The guidance specifies that up to a total of one third of the clinical study samples may be supplemented with these types of alternative samples. It provides more flexibility in selecting the comparator method as well as more consistency in terms of the criteria for accuracy for waived tests as compared with moderate and high complexity tests.

The FDA clarifies that the guidance only represents the agency's current thinking on reporting results from studies evaluating diagnostic tests. Companies may use an alternative approach for a waiver application as long as it satisfies the CLIA statutory requirements.

References

1. Federal Register, 30 January 2008, 73(20), 5574-5575, www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/E8-1557.pdf

2. FDA guidance on Recommendations for Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) Waiver Applications for Manufacturers of In Vitro Diagnostic Devices, 30 January 2008, www.fda.gov/cdrh/oivd/guidance/1171.html#3

References

1. RAJ Devices Online, 23 January 2008

2. The Regulatory Affairs Journal - Devices, 2008, 16(1), 29-30

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS113794

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel