Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

DTC Advertising

This article was originally published in SRA

Executive Summary

MoH due to issue a second report for consideration by the Cabinet

MoH due to issue a second report for consideration by the Cabinet

According to the Researched Medicines Industry Association of New Zealand (RMI), the Ministry of Health (MoH) is due to submit a report to the Cabinet outlining, once again, several options for direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising. This follows a MoH review into the practice, as requested by the minister of health, Hon Annette King. The RMI assumes that, as in the report issued for consultation in 2000 (see above), the options will range from a complete ban through to maintaining the status quo, but that this report may also include discussion on `disease awareness' advertising (as practised in Australia) and a `tougher, more regulated form of DTC advertising'.

Background

The MoH first made its recommendations for the options available on DTC advertising in a discussion paper issued in December 20002. The decision of the minister of health to allow DTC advertising but with stricter regulations, following this consultation on the paper, was never actually implemented and a report, issued in February 2003, has sparked argument, once more, over whether there should be a ban on DTC advertising of prescription medicines3. The report (the Toop Report), which was issued in February 2003 by a group of academic general practitioners from all four New Zealand schools of medicine, reviewed the local and overseas literature regarding DTC advertising, and examined the development of the current state of the practice in New Zealand and the US, and the policy positions of other international jurisdictions. It concluded that there is convincing evidence to justify a ban in New Zealand, such as negative effects on health funding, the patient-clinician relationship and patient safety, and recommended that `the government introduce regulations and/or legislation to prohibit the advertising of POMs directly to the public, through print and broadcast media or any other means'. In response, the New Zealand Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) commissioned a report from a public policy consultant, Barrie Saunders, to review the Toop Report4. This rejected many of the findings of the Toop Report, notably concluding that the case for banning DTC advertising is very weak.

References

1. Personal communication, RMI, 14 October 2003

2. The Regulatory Affairs Journal , 2001, 12 (1), 58-59

3. Direct to Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs in New Zealand: For Health or for Profit - Report to the Minister of Health supporting the case for a ban on DTCA, February 2003, www.chmeds.ac.nz/report.pdf

4. Direct to Consumer Advertising of Prescription Drugs in New Zealand - Professors' Protest to Governmen' Placed Under the Microscope, 7 April 2003, www.asa.co.nz/Research_Papers

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS109273

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel