NAD Has ‘High Hopes’ Firms Cooperate On Schedules To Accelerate Reviews
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
The National Advertising Division changes its review process to allow opposing firms some control over scheduling in the process and in resolving their disputes. The changes, recommended by ABA committees, also impose fees for both firms in appeals and allow more time for compliance with decisions.
You may also be interested in...
Flonase Ad Claims Settlement Confidential, But McNeil Likely Gains Choosing Court Over NAD
When prompt action is a primary goal, as McNeil aimed for in challenging ad claims for Glaxo’s Flonase Allergy Relief, lawyers say going to court is a better option than going to the National Advertising Division. Even with allegations that wither under the opposing firm’s rebuttal, litigation of advertising complaints it gains publicity than a NAD review would generate.
MoCRA’s Adulteration Ambiguity And FDA’s New Cosmetic Recall Authority: Attorney Weighs In
The US FDA should use guidance or rulemaking to clarify MoCRA provisions related to adulteration, Amin Wasserman Gurnani attorney Angela Diesch suggested at the Independent Beauty Association’s Cosmetics Convergence Spring Symposium. Attendees also sought her take on whether the agency’s new recall authority is likely to spell an increase in cosmetic product recalls.
Beauty Packaging Producers: July Marks Registration Deadline With PRO In Three States
Companies considered producers of single-use packaging in Oregon, Colorado and California must register with Circular Action Alliance, the leading (and currently only) producer responsibility organization, by 1 July 2024 under new state recycling laws.