Vision Health Supplements Blurry On AREDS Formulation – Study
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
A study finds claims for ocular supplements cited or relied on AREDS findings even when the products did not match the formulas assessed in the research by NIH’s National Eye Institute. The products emphasize AREDS but offer little information to consumers, they say.
You may also be interested in...
AREDS-Inspired Study Challenges Omega-3 Cognitive Benefit Claims
Omega-3 supplementation had no impact on cognitive function in a five-year assessment of elderly people participating in AREDS2 research, say NIH researchers. But they add in the JAMA study that longer-term use of omega-3s could result in a different outcome.
AREDS-Inspired Study Challenges Omega-3 Cognitive Benefit Claims
Omega-3 supplementation had no impact on cognitive function in a five-year assessment of elderly people participating in AREDS2 research, say NIH researchers. But they add in the JAMA study that longer-term use of omega-3s could result in a different outcome.
CVS Supplement Deceptively Capitalizes On Proximity To AREDS-Formula Product – Complaint
CVS supplement Advanced Eye Health deceives consumers by piggy-backing off NIH study findings of a Bausch + Lomb formula found to reduce eye disease progression, says a complaint seeking class action status in California state court.