Bodyarmor Rejects NAD’s ‘Upgrade’ Claim Critique
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Executive Summary
Gatorade sports drinks Stokely-Van Camp challenged that Bodyarmor Nutrition was noncompliant with NAD’s April 2014 finding that its ads combined claims that are supported individually in such a way that they created unsupported comparative claims
You may also be interested in...
BodyArmor Rejects NAD Ad Claims Decision Following Gatorade Challenge
BA Sports stands by claims comparing BodyArmor SuperDrink to Gatorade and will not pull or change ads as an industry self-regulation group recommends. Firm's response could draw FTC attention, but previously ignoring the group's recommendations apparently has not prompted FTC enforcement.
Summers Blasts NAD “Secret Rules” After J&J Ointment Claim Challenge
Claims for Summers Labs’ Triple Paste diaper rash ointment spurred Desitin maker Johnson & Johnson to bring a challenge through the National Advertising Division. Summers disagreed with NAD’s conclusion on a physician survey it conducted and declined to discontinue a doctor-recommended claim.
Jurors' Answers In FTC's Prevagen Complaint Might Burst A Memory Bubble For Health Claims
“No” answers in New York federal court on whether all but two of Prevagen claims were “materially misleading” could put a fork in the road of a long dispute between FTC and supplement product manufacturers and marketers.