SmartX “Brain Supplement” Firm Should Rethink Its Product Claims – NAD
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Cerebral Success submitted studies that did not test SmartX products or similar formulas, but were limited to findings on separate ingredients. NAD also said even when using the disclaimer “designed to,” an advertiser must provide reasonable support a product will “deliver the touted benefits to consumers.”
You may also be interested in...
National Advertising Division says Bel Marra Health's reliance on ingredient studies with dosage or usage that could not translate to the ingredients in the product failed to support its claims. “Without testing that the ingredients in the quantity found in Hearing Rescue have the claimed effect, the results from these studies cannot be used to support qualified claims that the same ingredients in the product reduce the damage caused by repeated noise exposure and improve hearing,” NAD said following a review from a challenge by the Council for Responsible Nutrition.
US Ninth Circuit affirms a district court’s summary judgment in favor of Target and manufacturer of Up & Up brand biotin supplement it sells. Indian manufacturer targeted in putative class-action in New York prompted FDA’s 2016 creation of import alert category for Ayurvedic supplements.
In its “robust, holistic hub” online, firms in the VMS product supply chain can determine their needs, “by product, solution or delivery formats,” and use a “comprehensive and unique portfolio” to “turn natural sources into shelf-ready products.”