Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Industry Cost Estimates For Proposed Consumer Antiseptic Rule Dwarf FDA’s

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

The Personal Care Products Council and American Cleaning Institute challenge FDA cost projections and question the agency’s proposal for clinical studies data to back the efficacy of antibacterial hand-wash products. The groups say manufacturers require guidance and request an extension of the deadline for data submissions, currently December 2014.

You may also be interested in...



FDA Says Antiseptics Need Testing Or Face Reformulation, Relabeling

FDA proposes to amend the OTC antiseptic drug product monograph to require more detailed safety and efficacy tests, pointing to mounting data that shows antibacterial wash products could pose health risks and contribute to increase antibacterial resistance.

Buckle Up, Industry: EWG Finds ‘4 Million Asbestos Fiber Structures’ In Makeup For Young Girls

US House Energy and Commerce Chair Frank Pallone took note on 16 January of the Environmental Working Group’s finding of asbestos contamination in a “Princess” makeup set intended for young girls. Rep. Debbie Dingell, D-MI, will speak to the test results first, pushing her own legislation that would require asbestos testing of talc-containing children’s cosmetics in accordance with preferred methods.

Colgate’s Tom’s Of Maine Back In Federal Court Over ‘Natural’ Claims

Tom's natural claims on toothpastes and deodorants are false and misleading, a plaintiff alleges in a proposed class action filed in Massachusetts federal court. Similar to previous complaints against Colgate/Tom’s, the plaintiff’s case is premised on the contention that “natural,” as opposed to “100% natural,” means no synthetic ingredients.

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS106989

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel