Industry Seeks Perspective, Greater Role In California Safer Products Process
This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet
Industry associations request input on California’s selection of priority targets under the state’s Safer Consumer Products regulation. Manufacturers and other experts should be consulted more actively as the state prioritizes chemicals and product categories of concern and compiles related safety profiles, the groups suggest.
You may also be interested in...
EU Scientific Committee Affirms Safety Of Anti-Dandruff Zinc Pyrithione Under Threat Of Cosmetic Ban
The Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety upholds that zinc pyrithione is safe for use in rinse-off anti-dandruff hair products at levels up to 1%. In recent years, the cosmetics industry has pushed for a 2% ceiling on ZPT content in that capacity – with considerable inroads made. Where that proposal now stands vis-à-vis the ingredient’s pending CMR 1B classification and shifting political sands is uncertain.
The bipartisan SHOP SAFE Act of 2020 would require e-commerce platforms to vet and obtain compliance commitments from third-party sellers, include their identities and business information on-site, and block continued access by repeat trademark infringers. The US House bill is backed by the Personal Care Products Council, which cites weaknesses in the current system that allow illicit trade to flourish.
FDA’s food, dietary supplement and cosmetics division seeks funding to support its artificial intelligence capabilities, including post-market surveillance and speedy interventions in instances where safety issues arise. Also of note, the agency cites UV filters’ effects on the skin microbiome as a research priority in its fiscal 2021 budget justification to Congress.