Pink Sheet is part of Pharma Intelligence UK Limited

This site is operated by Pharma Intelligence UK Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 13787459 whose registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. The Pharma Intelligence group is owned by Caerus Topco S.à r.l. and all copyright resides with the group.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction

FDA Steps Up Records Scrutiny In GMP Inspections

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

FDA inspectors are no longer content with only seeing that records are kept by supplement manufacturers. The agency is warning companies that GMP compliance requires maintaining comprehensive batch production records, including information on applicable manufacturing procedures.

As promised, FDA inspectors are drilling down into dietary supplement manufacturers’ recordkeeping processes, no longer content simply to see that records are kept but reviewing the records’ thoroughness. Warning letters citing deviations from the supplement good manufacturing practices final rule show FDA is paying close attention to incomplete batch production records that lack information on applicable manufacturing procedures and the specific equipment used in production. The agency’s most recently posted supplement GMP warning letters are compiled below.

Recipient

Warning Letter Date

Inspection Dates

Warning Letter Highlights

Algaen Corp.

(Winston-Salem, N.C.)

March 8, 2013

July 31 – Aug. 1, 2012

Algaen, maker of AlgaBerry products, has “not prepared and kept written procedures for personnel, including written procedures for preventing microbial contamination, hygienic practices, and personnel qualification requirements.” Among the hygienic practices not recorded were “wearing outer garments in a manner that protects against contamination hand washing, removal of unsecured jewelry prior to working with ingredients, maintaining gloves used in handling of components, wearing, where appropriate, hair restraints, not storing clothing or other personal belongings in certain areas, and other steps that would protect against contamination.”

ProNatural Nutrition LLC

(Cedar City, Utah)

July 19, 2013

Oct. 11-22, 2012

FDA cited ProNatural Nutrition for selling unapproved new drugs with colloidal silver. The firm’s batch production records also lacked the identity of equipment used, statements of processing yields and the results of testing performed during production. ProNatural’s Nov. 14 response to FDA said, “‘We will update the written checklist of what is required and what will be a part of every production batch records.’ Besides paraphrasing the deviations noted on the 483, to date, you have not provided any additional documentation so that we can ascertain the implementation of your proposed corrective actions; therefore, we deem your response unacceptable.”

N.V.E. Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(Andover, N.J.)

July 22, 2013

Sept. 11-26, 2012

N.V.E.’s procedure for handling product complaints “lacks details and directions for obtaining and documenting product information, complaint information, and the review, disposition, and follow-up actions taken for product complaints. … From October 2011 through June 2012, you received 29 health related complaints, including a complaint of a heart attack, a possible allergic reaction, jittery, sick feeling, and a rash. You were unable to provide all this information to our investigators as required for product complaints. These products include Stacker 2 brand: XPLC; Stacker 2; Black Jax; Yellow Hornet. … While corrective measures were documented in your Jan. 15, 2013, response, you did not provide supporting information to demonstrate that the products documented during the inspection were part of any corrective actions.”

Natural Products Services Inc.

(Escondido, Calif.)

July 23, 2013

Oct. 11-22, 2012

Natural Products Services, which makes CircuForce and HealthForce Liver Rescue 4+, “did not make and keep records of the written procedures for manufacturing operations. You must also establish and follow written procedures for manufacturing operations.” FDA said the firm’s Nov. 7 response was “inadequate. You state ‘The use of the major pieces of equipment [in] the operations area is identified within the Batch Production Records for Dietary Supplement Products’ and refer to the BPR for Truly Natural Vitamin C that you provided in your response as an example. The BPR identifies the equipment used in manufacturing the batch; however, it does not include the applicable manufacturing procedures.”

Topics

Latest Headlines
See All
UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS106560

Ask The Analyst

Ask the Analyst is free for subscribers.  Submit your question and one of our analysts will be in touch.

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel