Pink Sheet is part of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC’s registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use. For high-quality copies or electronic reprints for distribution to colleagues or customers, please call +44 (0) 20 3377 3183

Printed By

UsernamePublicRestriction
UsernamePublicRestriction

Patient Library Needed For Comparative Research Findings – Experts

This article was originally published in The Tan Sheet

Executive Summary

A centralized, user-friendly repository of outcomes is needed to ensure consumers and doctors can understand the increasing volume of comparative effectiveness research expected in coming years, policy experts suggest in Health Affairs.

You may also be interested in...



Plan For Spending Comparative Effectiveness Money Due July 30

Questions swirling around the $1.1 billion in comparative effectiveness research funding should be answered by July 30, the due date for a report to Congress with details of how the money provided in the economic stimulus package for the research will be spent

Performance Issues With CDC’s COVID-19 Assay Reagent Slows Rollout Of Test Kits To US States

A reagent in a batch of COVID-19 tests shipped by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to state laboratories “wasn’t performing consistently,” a top CDC official says, so the agency is reformulating it – slowing down the labs’ ability to use the diagnostic, which yielded inconsistent results when quality-tested. But waiting in the wings are commercial coronavirus test kits being developed by Qiagen and Cepheid; both firms say they’ll submit the kits to the FDA for emergency-use approval.

Study Says FDA Waited Too Long To Ban Pelvic Mesh For POP Repairs

Roughly 18.5% of patients who received reinterventions to fix mesh implants for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair experienced complications they will likely endure for the rest of their lives, and they also face a 2.5% higher rate of further surgeries than non-mesh patients, says a recent 54,194-woman study detailed in Obstetrics & Gynecology. The study authors lay out a case that the US FDA should have forced removal of mesh from the market sooner.

Topics

UsernamePublicRestriction

Register

PS104646

Ask The Analyst

Please Note: You can also Click below Link for Ask the Analyst
Ask The Analyst

Your question has been successfully sent to the email address below and we will get back as soon as possible. my@email.address.

All fields are required.

Please make sure all fields are completed.

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please make sure you have filled out all fields

Please enter a valid e-mail address

Please enter a valid Phone Number

Ask your question to our analysts

Cancel